ONE-POINT CLOSURE MODELS FOR BUOYANCY-DRIVEN TURBULENT FLOWS

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Momentum Transfer and Turbulent Kinetic Energy Budgets within a Dense Model Canopy (2004, methodology): “…to the inability of eddy-viscosity models to simulate flows subject to forces imposed by bodies immersed in the fluid or flows with significant non-local momentum exchange, as is the case within the CSL (Shaw 1977; Raupach 1988; Wilson 1988; Ayotte et al., 1999; Finnigan, 2000; Hanjalic, 2002).”
Contribution to elliptic relaxation modelling of turbulent natural and mixed convection (2005, methodology): “, 2002; Medić and Durbin, 2002), in flows dominated by thermal buoyancy the simple isotropic expressions for turbulent stress, and especially for the turbulent flux, have been found to be very erroneous (Kenjereš, 1998; Kenjereš and Hanjalić, 1995, 1999, 2000; Dol et al., 1997, 1999; Hanjalić, 2002;”
Solutal-convection regimes in a two-dimensional porous medium (2014, background): “The 〈(∂c′/∂x)2〉 term can be interpreted as the local scalar dissipation rate of turbulence (for example, Hanjalic 2002; see also Hidalgo et al. 2012).”