Extreme inefficiency of two conventional, technical fishways used by European river lamprey (Lampetra fluviatilis)

By W. Foulds, M. Lucas. 2013

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In recent years, fishways have increasingly been designed and installed with the intention to not only provide economically important fishes, such as salmonids, with free passage at barriers, but also for other elements of the migratory fish community. However, in Europe and North America, large numbers of conventional technical fishways exist, for which the efficacy and suitability for non-salmonid species is often inadequately known. Using passive integrated transponder (PIT) telemetry, this study evaluated the efficacy of two such conventional, technical fishways (pool and weir and plain Denil baffle) located on the Yorkshire River Derwent, north-east England, for the threatened anadromous European river lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis, an anguilliform swimmer, over the upstream migration and spawning seasons. For lamprey that entered the fishways, 0.0% and 5.0% passage efficiencies were recorded for Denil (n = 1) and pool and weir (n = 1) fishways, respectively, over the entire study period. The pool and weir fishway exhibited poor attraction efficiency (42.6%) compared to the Denil fishway (91.8%), and lamprey took significantly longer to locate the pool and weir fishway, probably as a result of ineffective attraction flow. Most lamprey detected at the fishway entrances were recorded within 24 h of release and returned mostly during high flow events on up to 12 separate dates over a 150 day period. Under these conditions, these fishways were unsuitable for river lamprey. Emphasis is placed upon the increased need for a thorough consideration of the entire migratory fish community during the inception of fishway designs, and that post-construction, strategic evaluation of fishways should be actively supported and encouraged to advance the provision of effective multi-species fishways.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/772fe336306039799c1e449bbaff4dfeca2ff064

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Anders Forsman

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. Anders Forsman
  2. C. Tamario
  3. Johanna Sunde
  4. E. Petersson
  5. Petter Tibblin

Citations in the corpus