Prospective motion correction in brain imaging: A review
By Julian R. Maclaren, Michael Herbst, Oliver Speck, Maxim Zaitsev. 2013
401 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos
- Jesper L. R. Andersson
- Arvid Lundervold
- Pierre LeVan
- Maxim Zaitsev
- Benjamin R. Knowles
- Michael Herbst
- Julian R. Maclaren
Citations in the corpus
- An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI (2018, background): “In prospective motion correction, real-time MR physics is also an important part of the picture [223,224].”
- A Comprehensive Assessment of Regional Variation in the Impact of Head Micromovements on Functional Connectomics (2013, neutral): “…of MRI acquisition strategies that are robust tomotion—which already exist for structural imaging (Brown et al., 2010; Kuperman et al., 2011; White et al., 2010) and are under development for functional imaging (Maclaren et al., 2013; Ooi et al., 2011; Speck et al., 2006; Zaitsev et al., 2006).”
- Motion Artefacts in MRI: a Complex Problem with Many Partial Solutions (2015, background): “Covering this topic in detail is beyond the scope of this study; interested readers are referred to a recent review article.(109) Postprocessing Techniques and Retrospective Correction While prospective correction methods aim at maintaining data quality during the acquisition, retrospective techniqu”
- An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging (2016, background): “Even if measuring the eddy currents is preferred, that doesn't address the problem of subject movement, unless one has some strategy for measuring that too (Maclaren et al., 2013).”
- Prospective Motion Correction in Functional MRI (2016, background): “Furthermore, rotation of the head about any axis non-parallel to the main magnetic field direction causes the field deviations arising from head tissues to change; they do not simply move in synchrony with the head (Maclaren et al., 2013; Ooi et al., 2013b), as can be seen in Figure 1.”