The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behavior

By L. Scannell, R. Gifford. 2010

701 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Sociology and Political Science, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/772c148e1b1007c48a4a7d49ea4c27d30ba76c9d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

In Sociology and Political Science

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Place attachment and natural hazard risk: Research review and agenda (2016, background): “Such processes are comparable to those emerging from interpersonal attachment, as highlighted in the increasingly consistent amount of research that compares place and interpersonal attachment (Scannell, 2013; Scannell & Gifford, 2010, 2013).”
Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Role of Public Perception in Infrastructure and the Social Factors for Sustainable Development (2018, background): “The place attachment can be due to the attachment of natural factors and social factors [26].”
Home and away: cross-contextual consistency in tourists’ pro-environmental behavior (2020, background): “Scannell and Gifford (2010) found people with greater levels of environmental attachment were more likely to engage in PEBs.”
Pro-Environmental Behavior: Does It Matter How It’s Measured? Development and Validation of the Pro-Environmental Behavior Scale (PEBS) (2013, methodology): “Davis et al. (2009) and (2011) used 28 items from the GEB scale, while Scannell and Gifford (2010) used 30 items from it.”
An Exploration of the Relationships between Adults' Childhood and Current Nature Exposure and Their Mental Well-Being (2023, background): “…et al., 2001; Wells, 2000), to improve cognitive development in domains including awareness, reasoning, and observational skills (e.g., Pyle, 2002), as well as to increase ecological attitudes and behaviors (e.g., Scannell & Gifford, 2010; Vorkinn & Riese, 2001); see Chawla (2015) for a review.”
Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? (2011, positive): “Hidalgo andHernandez(2001) and Scannell and Gifford (2010b) in turn observed that physical factors were more important reasons for attachment to the city, but social factors were for home and neighborhood.”
Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review. (2014, background): “However, place attachment comes in multiple varieties, and not all seem to be related to pro-environmental behaviour: natural but not civic place attachment has that connection (Scannell & Gifford, 2010).”
Personally Relevant Climate Change (2013, background): “Place attachment is also associated with more self-reported proenvironmental behaviors (e.g., Clayton, 2003; Scannell & Gifford, 2010b; Vaske & Kobrin, 2001).”