Modelling motivation and habit in stable travel mode contexts

By Benjamin Gardner. 2009

299 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7713a61a1ee75b1fb49d0496ef1fd5a7cc002cc6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Does habit weaken the relationship between intention and behaviour? Revisiting the habit‐intention interaction hypothesis (2020, background): “…dichotomous outcome – either the behaviour is enacted or it is not – the hypothesis has been most commonly applied to predict the frequency with which an action is performed, or tendencies to act across multiple occasions (e.g., the number of car journeys undertaken in a given week; Gardner, 2009).”
From attitude to satisfaction: introducing the travel mode choice cycle (2021, unknown): “the chosen option is directly retrievable from memory (Bamberg et al., 2003a; Gardner, 2009; Gärling, Fujii, & Boe, 2001).”
What cognitive mechanisms predict travel mode choice? A systematic review with meta-analysis (2017, background): “Abraham, 2008) emphasising both the importance of intentions not to drive and the challenges of translating such motivation into action by those who habitually and perhaps unthinkingly drive to travel (Gardner, 2009).”
Promoting habit formation (2013, background): “The ‘intention (cid:1) behaviour gap’ is well-documented (e.g., Webb & Sheeran, 2006), and may be overcome by using self-regulatory strategies such as planning (Michie, Abraham, Whittington, McAteer, & Gupta, 2009).”
Empowering interventions to promote sustainable lifestyles: Testing the habit discontinuity hypothesis in a field experiment (2016, unknown): “These behaviours are conducted frequently, usually at the same location and time, and are less guided by conscious intent (e.g., Danner, Aarts, & de Vries, 2008; Gardner, 2009; Ji & Wood, 2007; Neal, Wood, Labrecque, & Lally, 2012; Ouellette & Wood, 1998; Triandis, 1977; Verplanken, Aarts, van Knipp”
Old Habits Die Hard (2015, background): “Once this happens, the behaviour is initiated almost reflexively by environmental cues, rather than deliberate decision processes, meaning information can no longer readily have an influence (Gardner, 2009; Orbell & Verplanken, 2010; Verplanken et al., 1994, 1997).”
Understanding public transit use behavior: integration of the theory of planned behavior and the customer satisfaction theory (2017, background): “Some studies found that attitude and intention lose their originally-dominant effects when transport mode use behavior becomes habitual or automatic scripted (see, for example, Gardner 2009; Verplanken and Aarts 1999).”
Towards parsimony in habit measurement: Testing the convergent and predictive validity of an automaticity subscale of the Self-Report Habit Index (2012, methodology): “entered into the primary analyses reported below ([16],”
Analysing cycling as a social practice: An empirical grounding for behaviour change (2015, background): “The individualist foundation of much contemporary transport-related research (e.g. Anable, 2005; Bamberg & Schmidt, 2003; Bamberg et al., 2011; Gardner, 2009) has been criticised firstly for the limited effectiveness of measures based thereon (see critique of ‘soft measures’ above).”