Indication of reactor ν(e) disappearance in the Double Chooz experiment.

By Y. Abe, C. Aberle, T. Akiri, J. D. dos Anjos, F. Ardellier, A. F. Barbosa, A. Baxter, M. Bergevin, A. Bernstein, T. Bezerra and 175 more. Physical Review Letters, 2012

671 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/770e0ff285a7170f3b573857ad7d83793de0d789

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

1. Z. Xing
2. A. Marrone
3. E. Lisi
4. A. Palazzo
5. Francesco Capozzi
6. Y. Farzan
7. M. Tórtola
8. A. Studenikin

Citations in the corpus

• Neutrino Oscillations and Non-standard Interactions (2017, background): “4 km and 1 km from the neutrino source, respectively [3].”
• Current unknowns in the three-neutrino framework (2018, methodology): “Systematic errors are already comparable to statistical ones in both Daya Bay and RENO, and some systematics are shared by all reactor experiments including Double Chooz.”
• Lepton Number Violation: Seesaw Models and Their Collider Tests (2017, background): “In recent years, several reactor experiments, such as Daya Bay [68], Double Chooz [69], and RENO [70] have reported non-zero measurements of θ13 by searching for the disappearance of anti-electron neutrinos.”