Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited

By T. Shakespeare. 2013

807 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Disability as Inequality: Social Disparities, Health Disparities, and Participation in Daily Activities (2018, background): “…Verbrugge and Jette’s (1994) Disablement Process Model, suggest similarly.3 Empirical attempts to disentangle the contributors to differences in activity participation by disability status are limited, despite ongoing theoretical debate about the disablement process (Shakespeare 2013; Thomas 2007).”
Provocations for Critical Disability Studies (2019, background): “Our concern is when they are dismissed as being overly complex (a consideration discussed by Galis 2011) and deemed, unfairly in our view, not to be in tune with the lived, embodied realities of impairment (Shakespeare 2013).”
Feeling disability: theories of affect and critical disability studies (2018, background): “Critical realists such as Shakespeare (2014) and Vehmas and Watson (2014) lambast poststructuralist leanings within critical disability studies”
Inclusion Illusion: Questioning the Inclusiveness of Integrated Physical Education (2019, methodology): “A person-first approach to disability language, informed by a rights-based approach to understanding disability, is deliberately used in this article to be respectful and demonstrate support for social inclusion and disability rights (Peers, Spencer-Cavaliere, & Eales, 2014; Shakespeare, 2013).”