SOME PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF ARTI CIAL INTELLIGENCE
By John McCarthy. 1987
Subfields: Philosophy
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Philosophy
- Vaishak Belle
- Joscha Bach
- Hector J. Levesque
- Murray Shanahan
- Erik T. Mueller
- Gerhard Lakemeyer
- Moritz Tenorth
- Michael Beetz
Citations in the corpus
- CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledge (2019, background): “Many commonsense representations and inference procedures have been explored (McCarthy and Hayes, 1969; Kowalski and Sergot, 1986) and large-scale commonsense knowledge-bases have been developed (Lenat, 1995; Speer et al.”
- Concrete Problems in AI Safety (2016, background): “1Intuitively, this seems related to the frame problem, an obstacle in efficient specification for knowledge representation raised by [95].”
- Logic meets Probability: Towards Explainable AI Systems for Uncertain Worlds (2017, background): “Indeed, McCarthy and Hayes [1969] argued thus: 1.”
- The Symbol Grounding Problem (1990, background): “One well-known (though misdiagnosed) manifestation of it is the so-called "frame" problem [22, 24, 26, 34]: It is a frustrating but familiar experience in writing "knowledge-based" programs that a system apparently behaving perfectly intelligently for a while can be foiled by an unexpected case that”
- Learning Placeholders for Open-Set Recognition (2021, background): “Since it is impossible to cover all classes in the world as training set [19, 33], the model would treat all novel category instances as known ones.”
- The challenge of crafting intelligible intelligence (2018, background): “Furthermore, goal specifications are likewise incomplete [29].”
- Default Reasoning about Spatial Occupancy (1995, background): “…knowledge representation literature, and a variety of choices for the ontology and predicates of such a language have been suggested, along with collections of relevant 2 axioms (see, for example, [McCarthy & Hayes, 1969], [McDermott, 1982], [Allen, 1984], [Hayes, 1985], [Kowalski & Sergot, 1986]).”
- PDDL2.1: An Extension to PDDL for Expressing Temporal Planning Domains (2003, result): “The decision to consider actions in this way is similar to that made by many temporal reasoning researchers (Shanahan, 1990a; McCarthy & Hayes, 1969; McDermott, 1982).”
- Autonomous agents modelling other agents: A comprehensive survey and open problems (2017, background): “Ghaderi et al. (2007) propose a framework based on the situation calculus (McCarthy and Hayes, 1969) for reasoning about beliefs and coordination in agent teams.”
- Economic Opportunity and Evolution: Beyond Landscapes and Bounded Rationality (2013, background): “Rather, we should instead focus on the “frame problem” (originally introduced by McCarthy and Hayes, 1969; for a broader sense of the frame problem, see Dennett, 1984).8 Put simply, the frame problem focuses us on the problematic nature of explaining the full task set of activities and possible…”
- Essentials of General Intelligence: The Direct Path to Artificial General Intelligence (2007, background): “The relatively fixed, high-level methods of knowledge representation and manipulation that this approach entails are also prone to “frame of reference” [21, 25] and “brittleness” problems.”
- Semantical considerations on multiagent only knowing (2015, methodology): “This intuition has encouraged extensions of OL towards the design of practical cognitive agents [40,42,43], by introducing the appropriate variants of K and O in the language of the situation calculus [41,44,45].”
- Semantics and the electrophysiology of meaning: Tense, aspect, event structure (2004, background): “This is a consequence of the well-known ‘frame problem’ [134], which implies that it is impossible to enumerate all the effects and non-effects of an event.”
- EMA: A process model of appraisal dynamics (2009, background): “This is an aspect of the frame problem (McCarthy & Hayes, 1969) and there are a number of standard approaches for addressing it and which could 7$"*(1'%#'%!+$:"*(+'"=>?”
- How to Progress Beliefs in Continuous Domains (2014, background): “Reiter’s (2001) reconsideration of the situation calculus (McCarthy and Hayes 1969) has proven enormously useful for the design of logical agents, essentially paving the way for cognitive robotics (Lakemeyer and Levesque 2007).”