Spider: An R package for the analysis of species identity and evolution, with particular reference to DNA barcoding

490 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Non‐specific amplification compromises environmental DNA metabarcoding with COI (2019, unknown): “3.0 (Boyer et al., 2012; Brown et al., 2012).”
DNA-based species delimitation in algae (2014, methodology): “Software packages such as ‘Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery’ (Puillandre et al., 2011) and ‘SPecies IDentity and Evolution’ (Brown et al., 2012) aim at automatically detecting barcoding gaps in large datasets (Table 1).”
Methods for the extraction, storage, amplification and sequencing of DNA from environmental samples (2018, methodology): “2012) implemented in the R package ‘spider’ (Brown et al. 2012) that were specific to earthworms and did not amplify mollusc DNA.”
Barcoding's next top model: an evaluation of nucleotide substitution models for specimen identification (2012, methodology): “…of processes assumed by a model (Kelchner &Thomas 2007), and investigations using simulated and real data have shown that model selection can influence both support values and tree topologies (Cunningham et al. 1998; Buckley & Cunningham 2002; Lemmon & Moriarty 2004; Ripplinger & Sullivan 2008).”