Civic Measurement Models: Tapping Adolescents' Civic Engagement
By C. Flanagan, Amy K. Syvertsen, Michael D. Stout. 2007
154 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76a388708fa1df7a45945d828a3803f3dc9c4e49
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Lisa M. Jones
- Kimberly J. Mitchell
- Laura Wray‐Lake
- Aaron Metzger
- Amy K. Syvertsen
- Sonia Livingstone
- Catherine D. Marcum
Citations in the corpus
- Youth Anti-Racist Engagement: Conceptualization, Development, and Validation of an Anti-Racism Action Scale (2019, unknown): “For instance, survey instruments often measure civic engagement in general terms, such as youths’ expectations to “work with a group to solve a problem in the community where [they] live,” making it difficult to discern the types of social issues youth are addressing (Flanagan et al. 2007).”
- Testing multidimensional models of youth civic engagement: Model comparisons, measurement invariance, and age differences (2017, methodology): “Civic measures were drawn from existing sources and heavily adapted (Flanagan et al., 2007; Kahne, Middaugh, & Schutjer-Mance, 2005) or newly written but conceptually based on extant work (see Syvertsen et al., 2015).”
- Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship (2016, background): “Creative educational initiatives are developing in an effort to improve youth civic engagement (Flanagan et al., 2007; Kahne and Sporte, 2008; Lenzi et al., 2012; Sherrod et al., 2002) and educators play an important role (Kahne and Sporte, 2008).”