Retrieval of temperature and tangent altitude pointing from limb emission spectra recorded from space by the Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS)

By Thomas von Clarmann, N. Glatthor, U. Grabowski, Michael Höpfner, S. Kellmann, M. Kiefer, A. Linden, G. Tsidu, M. Milz, T. Steck and 6 more. 2003

293 citations recorded by the source corpus.

[1] Retrieval of abundances of atmospheric species from limb infrared emission spectra requires accurate knowledge of the pointing of the instrument in terms of elevation, as well as temperature and pressure profiles. An optimal estimation-based method is presented to infer these quantities from measured spectra. The successful and efficient joint retrieval of these largely correlated quantities depends strongly on the proper selection of the retrieval space, the selection of spectral microwindows, and the choice of reasonable constraints which force the solution to be stable. The proposed strategy was applied to limb emission spectra recorded with the Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) on board the Envisat research satellite in order to validate the instrument pointing information based on the satellite's orbit and attitude control system which uses star tracker information as a reference. Both systematic and periodic pointing calibration errors were detected, which meanwhile have been corrected to a major part. Furthermore, occasional pitch jumps were detected, which could be assigned to parameter uploads to the satellite's orbit and attitude control system. It has been shown that in general, it is justified to assume local thermodynamic equilibrium below 60 km for these purposes. The retrieval method presented has been proven to be suitable for independent monitoring of MIPAS line-of-sight pointing.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76a1f9372c9fcce16e7e60bf74a9fcfce8233211

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. A. Linden
  2. S. Chauhan
  3. U. Grabowski
  4. M. Kiefer
  5. N. Glatthor
  6. T. Schieferdecker

Citations in the corpus