Effects of coppicing on butterfly communities of woodlands

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does a minimal intervention approach threaten the biodiversity of protected areas? A multi-taxa short-term response to intervention in temperate oak-dominated forests (2015, background): “…forests, like partial cutting, may have positive effect on some groups of organisms (e.g. butterflies, moths, saproxylic beetles) (Bolz, 2008; Fartmann et al., 2013; Götmark, 2013) but also negative effects on another groups (e.g. fungi, molluscs) (Nordén et al., 2008; Rancka et al., 2015).”
Biodiversity of most dead wood-dependent organisms in thermophilic temperate oak woodlands thrives on diversity of open landscape structures (2014, background): “Oak woodlands have often been managed in forest systems known for higher canopy openness, such as coppices, coppices with standards or pasture woodlands (Vera, 2000; Horak et al., 2012; Fartmann et al., 2013).”