Accuracy of modern global earthquake catalogs
By Y. Kagan. 2003
226 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/768af6c11de5149c48613bc3d1825eb7f1481f2f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geophysics
- Alejandro Veen
- Frederic Paik Schoenberg
- S. Castellaro
- F. Mulargia
- R. Clements
- Stefan Wiemer
- Chien-Chih Chen
- Yih‐Min Wu
Citations in the corpus
- Short-Term Properties of Earthquake Catalogs and Models of Earthquake Source (2004, methodology): “Table 3 in Kagan (2003) demonstrated that the shortest interearthquake time interval in catalogs depends strongly on seismogram frequency and methods of seismic record interpretation.”
- Bayesian Estimation of the Spatially Varying Completeness Magnitude of Earthquake Catalogs (2010, background): “…this second definition, which assumes the validity of the Gutenberg–Richter law, in other words, the self-similarity of earthquakes (e.g., Wiemer and Katsumata, 1999; Wiemer and Wyss, 2000; Cao and Gao, 2002; Marsan, 2003; Kagan, 2002, 2003; Woessner and Wiemer, 2005; Amorèse, 2007; Iwata, 2008).”
- Aftershock Zone Scaling (2002, methodology): “The seismic moment is distributed according to the power law; the Gutenberg–Richter relation is a logarithmic transformation of the law (Kagan, 2002a).”
- Evaluation of space–time point process models using super‐thinning (2011, background): “…with the catalog considered here are well known, including potentially missing data at lower magnitudes, greater depths, and farther from seismometers in the seismic network, as well as missing events of low magnitude in the immediate vicinity just following major events (see e.g. Kagan, 2003).”
- Regression problems for magnitudes (2006, methodology): “where β∗ U = Sup{β : Un(β) ≥ −Un}, (28) β∗ L = Inf{β : Un(β) ≤ Un}.”