The genus Rosa(Rosoideae, Rosaceae) revisited: molecular analysis of nrITS‐1 and atpB‐rbcL intergenic spacer (IGS) versus conventional taxonomy

By Volker Wissemann, C. Ritz. 2005

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76848626906e16f09ad13cbe382ebe1d412109ef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

1. Thomas Borsch
2. D. Quandt
3. Anne Bruneau
4. Julian R. Starr
5. S. Joly
6. T. A. Dickinson

In Plant Science

1. D. Quandt
2. T. A. Dickinson
3. Thomas Borsch

Citations in the corpus

• Polyploidy, reproductive biology, and Rosaceae: understanding evolution and making classifications (2007, background): “The taxonomy of wild roses is similarly complicated by hybridization and polyploidy ( Wissemann and Ritz 2005, Joly et al. 2006).”
• Phylogenetic Relationships in the Genus Rosa: New Evidence from Chloroplast DNA Sequences and an Appraisal of Current Knowledge (2007, background): “…2006; Joly and Bruneau 2006) and ribosomal spacers (Wissemann and Ritz 2005; Ritz et al. 2005) indicate that this low-level of molecular divergence amongst rose species is not peculiar to the chloroplast, suggesting that most extant rose species have a very recent origin (Wissemann and Ritz 2005).”
• Mutational dynamics and phylogenetic utility of noncoding chloroplast DNA (2009, background): “Wissemann and Ritz (2005) recovered only weakly supported trees for the genus Rosa, and Kårehed et al. (2008) revealed it as the worst performing noncoding marker in Spermacoceae (Rubiaceae).”