Inductive Transfer for Neural Architecture Optimization
By Martin Wistuba, Tejaswini Pedapati. 2019
9 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The recent advent of automated neural network architecture search led to several methods that outperform state-of-the-art human-designed architectures. However, these approaches are computationally expensive, in extreme cases consuming GPU years. We propose two novel methods which aim to expedite this optimization problem by transferring knowledge acquired from previous tasks to new ones. First, we propose a novel neural architecture selection method which employs this knowledge to identify strong and weak characteristics of neural architectures across datasets. Thus, these characteristics do not need to be rediscovered in every search, a strong weakness of current state-of-the-art searches. Second, we propose a method for learning curve extrapolation to determine if a training process can be terminated early. In contrast to existing work, we propose to learn from learning curves of architectures trained on other datasets to improve the prediction accuracy for novel datasets. On five different image classification benchmarks, we empirically demonstrate that both of our orthogonal contributions independently lead to an acceleration, without any significant loss in accuracy.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- A Survey on Neural Architecture Search (2019, background): “Furthermore, architectures which perform well across a diverse set of tasks provide a competitive solution (Wistuba and Pedapati, 2019).”
- Towards Automated Neural Interaction Discovery for Click-Through Rate Prediction (2020, unknown): “DuetothehighcomplexityoftrainingtheDNNsandthepar-ticularityofevaluationcriteriaindifferenttasks,variousperfor-manceestimationstrategiesareproposed,includinglow-fidelity estimation[24,38],weightsharing[18,22],learningcurveextrap-olation[31],andnetworkmorphism[13].”