Prognostics of lithium-ion batteries based on relevance vectors and a conditional three-parameter capacity degradation model
By Dong Wang, Qiang Miao, Michael G. Pecht. 2013
334 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/766eb5bfaf1647ac7b2afeead1b9ed1b7eb73349
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
- Kailong Liu
- Xiaosong Hu
- Xianke Lin
- David A. Howey
- Simona Onori
- Rui Xiong
- Michael G. Pecht
- Yunhong Che
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Xiaosong Hu
- Zhen Hu
- Xianke Lin
- Simona Onori
- Yunhong Che
- David A. Howey
- Robert R. Richardson
- Michael A. Osborne
In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Citations in the corpus
- Battery Health Prediction Using Fusion-Based Feature Selection and Machine Learning (2020, methodology): “The empirical model of the capacity degradation is fitted by the RVM for capacity estimation [85].”
- Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on the Wiener Process with Measurement Error (2014, neutral): “, can be found in [19–25].”
- Gaussian process regression for forecasting battery state of health (2017, methodology): “cycle data extracted from [13] (see Appendix A, and Fig.”
- Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: A review (2019, methodology): “[144] used RVM to derive the relevance vectors to represent the battery capacity fade, and predict capacity degradation values for the future cycles of relevance vectors.”
- Review of the Remaining Useful Life Prognostics of Vehicle Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Data-Driven Methodologies (2016, background): “[27] obtained the relevance vectors from the degradation of battery capacity and the number of cycles.”