Growth without Governance

By Daniel A. Kaufmann, Aart C. Kraay. 2002

821 citations recorded by the source corpus.

It is well known that there is a strong positive correlation between per capita incomes and the quality of governance across countries. Kaufmann and Kraay propose an empirical strategy that allows separation of this correlation into (1) a strong positive causal effect running from better governance to higher per capita incomes, and, perhaps surprisingly at first, (2) a weak and even negative causal effect running in the opposite direction from per capita incomes to governance. The first result confirms existing evidence on the importance of good governance for economic development. The second result is new and suggests the absence of a "virtuous circle" in which higher incomes lead to further improvements in governance. This motivates the authors' choice of title, "Growth Without Governance." They document this evidence using a newly updated set of worldwide governance-indicators covering 175 countries for the period 2000-01, and use the results to interpret the relationship between incomes and governance focusing on the Latin America and Caribbean region—within a worldwide empirical context. Finally, the authors speculate about the potential importance of elite influence and state capture in accounting for the surprising negative effects of per capita incomes on governance, present some evidence on such capture in some Latin American countries, and suggest priorities for actions to improve governance when such pernicious elite influence shapes public policy. This paper - a joint product of the World Bank Institute and the Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the Bank to generate and analyze worldwide governance indicators, assessing the manifestations and consequences of governance.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76666417407c9db3d3c60b037f0125f0e09858b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Thorsten Beck
  2. Asli Demirgüç-Kunt
  3. Simplice A. Asongu
  4. Vojislav Maksimovic
  5. Ross Levine
  6. Vanessa S. Tchamyou
  7. C. Kirkpatrick
  8. Jakob de Haan

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Simplice A. Asongu
  2. Thorsten Beck
  3. Asli Demirgüç-Kunt
  4. Vojislav Maksimovic
  5. Vanessa S. Tchamyou
  6. Pedro C. Vicente
  7. Rodrigo R. Soares
  8. Jakob de Haan

Citations in the corpus