Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical semantic change
By A. Blank. 1999
Subfields: Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- Michael Lewis
- Mohit Bansal
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Jacob Andreas
- Dan Jurafsky
- Jure Leskovec
- Yejin Choi
- William L. Hamilton
Citations in the corpus
- Diachronic Word Embeddings Reveal Statistical Laws of Semantic Change (2016, background): “Various hypotheses have been offered about such regularities in semantic change, such as an increasing subjectification of meaning, or the gram-maticalization of inferences (e.g., Geeraerts, 1997; Blank, 1999; Traugott and Dasher, 2001).”
- Dynamic Language Models for Continuously Evolving Content (2021, background): “Aside from emerging words, it is well known that the semantics of existing words keep evolving [6, 24, 42, 43].”
- Multitasking Inhibits Semantic Drift (2021, background): “In the literature on human language change (Blank, 1999), semantic drift refers to a variety of phenomena, including specific terms becoming more general, general terms becoming specific, and parts coming to refer to wholes.”