Geographic variation in the foraging behaviour, diet and chick growth of rockhopper penguins
By Y. Tremblay, Y. Cherel. 2003
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76595a19c47bc0b65f40539e4bc11951c645264f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Y. Cherel
- R. Phillips
- Frederic Menard
- A. Lescroël
- A. Lorrain
- Daniel P. Costa
- J. González‐Solís
- B. Popp
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Daniel P. Costa
- Y. Cherel
- L. Dall'Antonia
- M. Tinker
- Keith A. Hobson
- Kerry J. Woo
- K. Elliott
- A. J. Gaston
Citations in the corpus
- Foraging under contrasting oceanographic conditions: the gentoo penguin at Kerguelen Archipelago (2005, background): “…Aptenodytes forsteri or Adélie Pygoscelis adeliae penguins, exhibit flexible chasing tactics (Watanuki et al. 1993, Wienecke & Robertson 1997, Tremblay & Cherel 2003), but none of them shows such a degree of plasticity both in the foraging dimensions (i.e. distance from the colony,…”
- Seabird foraging behaviour indicates prey type (2008, background): “Tremblay & Cherel (2003) also found that the foraging behaviour of rockhopper penguins (Eudyptes chrysocome) could be reduced to 3 axes, which they labeled dive mode (e.g. depth, duration), diving pattern (e.g. trip duration, number of dives) and variation of behaviour (e.g. standard deviation of…”
- Multiple foraging strategies in a marine apex predator, the Galapagos sea lion Zalophus wollebaeki (2008, methodology): “The deep divers presented characteristically deep dives, and had the lowest percentage of consecutive dives to the same IDZ, indicating that they were not likely feeding on the benthos.”
- Causes and consequences of individual variability and specialization in foraging and migration strategies of seabirds (2017, background): “After hatching in some penguins and alcids, males brood the chick while the females forage to pro vide meals for the offspring (Clarke et al. 1998, Tremblay & Cherel 2003, Paredes et al. 2006, Green et al. 2009); the reverse occurs in some terns (Becker & Ludwigs 2004).”
- Nitrogen and carbon isotope values of individual amino acids: a tool to study foraging ecology of penguins in the Southern Ocean (2009, background): “…m depth (Kooyman et al. 1992), and feeding almost exclusively on mesopelagic fish of the family Myctophidae, while other penguins (including AP, NRP, SRP) dive to shallower depths and mainly prey upon crustaceans (Cherel et al. 1993, 2007, Rodary et al. 2000; Tremblay & Cherel 2003, Cherel 2008).”
- Geographical variation in carbon stable isotope signatures of marine predators: a tool to investigate their foraging areas in the Southern Ocean (2007, background): “Indeed, the offshore king and crested penguins forage in the pelagic zone (Charrassin & Bost 2001, Tremblay & Cherel 2003), but open-sea gentoo penguins dive both pelagically and benthically and accordingly feed on both pelagic and benthic prey (Lescroël et al. 2004, Lescroël & Bost 2005).”
- Individual dietary specialization and dive behaviour in the California sea otter: Using archival time–depth data to detect alternative foraging strategies (2007, background): “…vertebrate predators in which individual specialization occurs: prey specializations are already recognized in penguins (Radl and Culik, 1999; Tremblay and Cherel, 2003), killer whales (Ford et al., 1998; Baird et al., 2000), bottlenose dolphins (Smolker et al., 1997; Mann and Sargeant,…”