Guaranteed Safe Online Learning via Reachability: tracking a ground target using a quadrotor
By Jeremy H. Gillula, Claire Jennifer Tomlin. 2012
108 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Artificial Intelligence
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Chelsea Finn
- Gregory Kahn
- Ken Goldberg
- Suraj Nair
- Julian Ibarz
- Dorsa Sadigh
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Chelsea Finn
- Suraj Nair
- Trevor Darrell
- Dorsa Sadigh
- Julian Ibarz
- Abhishek Gupta
Citations in the corpus
- Uncertainty-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Collision Avoidance (2017, background): “There is much prior work on safe robot control for safety-critical systems such as autonomous cars [29], legged robots [31], and quadrotors [20, 30, 9].”
- Safe Control under Uncertainty (2015, background): “More recently, safe learning approaches construct controllers that keep the system in the safe region, while the optimal strategy is learned online [15, 3, 1].”
- Reachability-based safe learning with Gaussian processes (2014, methodology): “In the literature this has typically been achieved by using conservative bounds on the disturbance [8].”
- Penalizing Side Effects using Stepwise Relative Reachability (2018, methodology): “…methods: methods that preserve reversibility (the reachability of a starting state) [Moldovan and Abbeel, 2012; Eysenbach et al., 2017], and reachability analysis methods that require reachability of a safe region [Mitchell et al., 2005; Gillula and Tomlin, 2012; Fisac et al., 2017].”
- Measuring and avoiding side effects using relative reachability (2018, background): “A similar argument applies to reachability analysis methods (Mitchell et al., 2005; Gillula and Tomlin, 2012; Fisac et al., 2017), which require that a safe region must be reachable by a known conservative policy: the agent would be penalized if another agent or an environment event make the safe…”
- Recovery RL: Safe Reinforcement Learning With Learned Recovery Zones (2020, methodology): “First, inspired by recent work in robust control [4, 11, 13, 21], we represent the RL agent with two policies: the first policy focuses on optimizing the unconstrained task objective (task policy) and the second policy takes control when the task policy is in danger of constraint violations in the…”
- Reducing Conservativeness in Safety Guarantees by Learning Disturbances Online: Iterated Guaranteed Safe Online Learning (2012, methodology): “For an easily understandable overview of HJI reachability, we refer the reader to Ding et al. [4].”
- Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learning (2021, methodology): “The general HJ reachability analysis framework (132) has also been combined with on-line dynamics model learning for a target tracking task (134), with online planning for safe exploration (135), and with temporal difference algorithms for safe RL (136).”
- Safe Control under Uncertainty with Probabilistic Signal Temporal Logic (2016, background): “Designing controllers under reachability analysis and safe learning are well-studied methods that allow specifying safety and reachability properties, while learning the optimal strategy online [32, 33, 15, 3, 1].”
- A General Safety Framework for Learning-Based Control in Uncertain Robotic Systems (2017, background): “Initial work exploring this approach was presented in [26] and [27].”