Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography.
By G. Diamond, S. Kaul. New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
735 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/764507a6f8b9880921cdbf47ae6e9abfa6e34b55
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. Budoff
- Damini Dey
- James K. Min
- B. Nørgaard
- J. Leipsic
- S. Achenbach
- L. Shaw
- M. Motwani
Citations in the corpus
- Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 5-year multicentre prospective registry analysis (2016, methodology): “Prior large-scale studies have documented the inadequacies of current limited-variable methods for prediction of disease prevalence, severity, and prognosis; and highlight the need for more accurate methods to perform these important clinical tasks.(27) – 29 As observed in other fields that require ”
- Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). (2014, background): “As a result of inadequate diagnostic discrimination with the use of noninvasive tests, up to 60% of subjects suspected of having CAD and referred for ICA do not have obstructive vessel narrowing (6), and the proportion without functionally significant myocardial ischemia would be expected to be even”
- International standardization of diagnostic criteria for microvascular angina. (2018, background): “us, Department of Cardiology, (b50% stenosis) coronary artery disease (CAD) [1].”