Socio-technical inertia: Understanding the barriers to electric vehicles

311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives (2014, unknown): “This is in line with findings from previous studies employing similar methods to assess the importance of attributes of sustainable innovations (e.g. Deloitte, 2010; Steinhilber et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2012).”
Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change (2017, unknown): “Steinhilber et al. (2013) write that although the theory ‘has been a powerful tool in helping understanding of how and why changes occur in the social application of technology, there has been a relative neglect of how embedded regimes may have diverse evolutionary pathways including non-change’.”
Promoting Community Renewable Energy in a Corporate Energy World (2015, background): “…perspective allows an appreciation of the complexity of change, including the role of different actors in a transition (Meadowcroft, 2009); policy mechanisms (Alkemade et al., 2011); market design and incentives (Smith Stegen and Seel, 2013); and, potential barriers (Steinhilber et al., 2013).”
Transition pathways revisited: Established firms as multi-level actors in the heavy vehicle industry (2015, background): “For a broader transition, however, niches are only one building block, as noted in a recent study of the obstacles encountered by electric vehicles (Steinhilber et al., 2013).”