Extending the Minority Stress Model to Understand Mental Health Problems Experienced by the Autistic Population

By M. Botha, D. Frost. Society and Mental Health, 2018

466 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Research into autism and mental health has traditionally associated poor mental health and autism as inevitably linked. Other possible explanations for mental health problems among autistic populations have received little attention. As evidenced by the minority disability movement, autism is increasingly being considered part of the identities of autistic people. Autistic individuals thus constitute an identity-based minority and may be exposed to excess social stress as a result of disadvantaged and stigmatized social status. The authors test the utility of the minority stress model as an explanation for the experience of mental health problems within a sample of high-functioning autistic individuals (n = 111). Minority stressors including everyday discrimination, internalized stigma, and concealment significantly predicted poorer mental health, despite controlling for general stress exposure. These results indicate the potential utility of minority stress in explaining increased mental health problems in autistic populations. Implications for research and clinical applications are discussed.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/763887c5026e8710757835a56c58ff448329bb50

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. M. Botha
2. D. Frost
3. B. Dibb

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. M. Botha
2. D. Frost
3. B. Dibb

Citations in the corpus

• "Autism is me": an investigation of how autistic individuals make sense of autism and stigma (2020, background): “…to the idea that autistic individuals constitute a minority group (Walker 2012), and are affected by processes of minority stress (Botha and Frost 2020) and minority-majority group processes (Botha and Frost 2020; Cage, Di Monaco, and Newel, Matthews, Ly, and Goldberg 2015; Sasson et al. 2017).”