Residual entropy, conditional entropy and subshift covers
By Mike Boyle, D. Fiebig, U. Fiebig. 2002
95 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7623e7a298df58ead934cfca4eb4ed6a30c1372b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Lai-Sang Young
- Tomasz Downarowicz
- Mike Boyle
- Tom A. Fisher
- Maria José Pacifico
- S. Newhouse
- Manjul Bhargava
- A. Shankar
In Mathematical Physics
- Lai-Sang Young
- Tomasz Downarowicz
- S. Newhouse
- Mike Boyle
- Lorenzo J. Díaz
- Tom A. Fisher
- Maria José Pacifico
- J. Vieitez
Citations in the corpus
- Symbolic extensions for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms (2009, background): “In fact, the existence of symbolic extensions seems to be related to the notion of asymptotically h-expansive systems, as defined by Misiurecicz [24] (in Section 2 we review all relevant notions in the introduction).”
- The entropy theory of symbolic extensions (2004, methodology): “Sex entropy was studied [ BFF , D2] in the notation of the residual entropy of T , which is by denition hres(T ) = hsex(T ) htop(T ). The residual entropy gives a coarse measure of describability of a system by symbolic dynamics.”
- Symbolic extensions and smooth dynamical systems (2005, result): “In 2002 M. Boyle published his early examples and results in a joint paper with D. Fiebig and U. Fiebig [3].”
- Entropy in dynamical systems (2003, methodology): “The outcome of this early work is published in [Boyle et al., 2002].”
- Entropy-expansiveness for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms (2010, background): “expansiveness. We observe that the hypotheses of Theorem 1.1 prevents the creation of homoclinic tangencies by perturbations, see for instance [W]. Next we derive some consequences of Theorem 1.1. In [BFF] it is shown that every entropy-expansive diffeomorphism has a principal symbolic extension. We ”