A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation

By Hans Kamp. 2008

1,398 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7602c565ee1f5345b4d114b42618d53780eaa4e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Wh-in-Situ Does Not Correlate with Wh-Indefinites or Question Particles (2007, background): “This different quantificational force depending on the context is the familiar quantificational variability property of indefinites (Kamp 1981, Heim 1982).”
Beyond Word Frequency: Bursts, Lulls, and Scaling in the Temporal Distributions of Words (2009, neutral): “Science 298:1569–1579.”
Split and Rephrase (2017, methodology): “…the complex sentence; (ii) A hybrid probabilistic-SMT model taking as input a deep semantic representation (Discourse representation structures, Kamp 1981) of the complex sentence produced by Boxer (Cur-ran et al., 2007); (iii) A multi-source encoder-decoder taking as input both the complex…”
Wide-Coverage Semantic Analysis with Boxer (2008, background): “DRT is a formal semantic theory originally designed by Kamp to cope with anaphoric pronouns and temporal relations (Kamp, 1981).”
The Non-Subject Bias of German Demonstrative Pronouns (2007, background): “Linguistic constraints on potential antecedents for anaphoric expressions have been investigated in syntactic theory under the rubric of Binding Theory (Chomsky 1981) and in more semantic settings in discourse representation theory (Kamp 1981) and centering theory (Grosz, Joshi and Weinstein 1995), ”
Reference Determination for Demonstrative Pronouns (2007, background): “One may think here of Donkey Pronouns (Kamp 1981) or E-type pronouns (Evans 1980), but also of pronouns whose referent must be inferred on the basis of one or more antecedent expressions with which the pronoun is not coreferential (Webber 1979).”