Robotics and the Lessons of Cyberlaw

By Ryan Calo. 2014

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Robotics & Control, Social Sciences & Humanities

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

In Robotics & Control

In Social Sciences & Humanities

Citations in the corpus

When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts (2017, background): “In addition to possible unemployment, the transition will bring new challenges, such as rebuilding infrastructure, protecting vehicle cyber-security, and adapting laws and regulations [5].”
Against the moral Turing test: accountable design and the moral reasoning of autonomous systems (2016, background): “Verification may be as important for what it stops from hasty introduction as it is what it announces as reliably moral.”
Artificial Intelligence Regulation: A Meta-Framework for Formulation and Governance (2020, background): “The widely disseminated use of AI in our daily actions and in an unnoticeable fashion [1] has introduced unprecedented legal issues in exceptional concepts and scenarios [2].”
Artificial intelligence and communication: A Human–Machine Communication research agenda (2019, background): “And so, equally part of this conversation is a re-examination of the nature of people and things upon which ethical guidelines (e.g. Gunkel, 2012b) and laws (e.g. Calo, 2015) were based.”
The Case for a Federal Robotics Commission (2014, background): “I have argued in a series of papers that robotics enables novel forms of human experience and, as such, challenges prevailing assumptions of law and policy.(5) My focus here is on a more specific question: whether robotics, collectively as a set of technologies, will or should occasion the establish”
Artificial Intelligence Governance and Ethics: Global Perspectives (2019, background): “Arkin 2009; Mason 2017), and the ability of existing laws to govern AI has emerged as key as to how future AI will be developed, deployed and implemented (see e.g. Leenes & Lucivero 2015; Calo 2015; Wachter et al. 2017a).”
Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence: Why they Matter and How to Address them (2021, background): “Gaps in this kind of responsibility have already received some attention, both from a moral (Matthias, 2004; Sparrow, 2007) and a legal perspective (Calo, 2015; Pagallo, 2013).”