The efficacy of bereavement interventions: Determining who benefits.

By Henk Schut, Margaret Stroebe, Jan van den Bout, Maaike A. Terheggen. 2001

272 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/75db063268d2f6d1dd06f4799cd445d416083338

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. R. Neimeyer
2. Christine Marcelle Heim
3. J. Holland
4. Holly Gwen Prigerson
5. C. Nemeroff
6. P. Boelen
7. Crystal L. Park
8. J. Gillies

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Christine Marcelle Heim
2. C. Nemeroff
3. R. Neimeyer
4. P. Boelen
5. Elisabeth B. Binder

Citations in the corpus

• The Underlying Structure of Grief: A Taxometric Investigation of Prolonged and Normal Reactions to Loss (2009, background): “Some evidence suggests that these small treatment effects might be due to lax inclusion criteria that allowed many normal grievers with little symptomatology into the treatment conditions (Currier et al. 2007; Currier et al. 2008b; Schut et al. 2001).”
• Neurobiological and psychiatric consequences of child abuse and neglect. (2010, background): “This finding was also reported by Tanskanen et al. (2004). Exposure to multiple traumas is an important factor in the relationship between childhood trauma and negative adult mental health outcomes as well as clinical course (Banyard, Williams, & Siegel, 2001).”