Multinomial logit analysis of household cooking fuel choice in rural Kenya: The case of Kisumu district

By Moses Pundo, G. Fraser. 2006

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The energy ladder: Theoretical myth or empirical truth? Results from a meta-analysis (2013, background): “2001, 410 households [52] B.”
Stacking up the ladder: A panel data analysis of Tanzanian household energy choices (2017, background): “In the fuel-choice literature, numerous authors have adopted a pooled multinomial logit approach to model fuel choices (Heltberg, 2005; Ouedraogo, 2006; Pundo and Fraser, 2006).”
An analysis of institutional and technical factors influencing agricultural marketing amongst smallholder farmers in the Kat River Valley, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa (2009, methodology): “It follows that a positive value indicates an increase in the likelihood that a household will change to the alternative option from the baseline group (Gujarati, 1992; Pundo and Fraser, 2006).”
Household Fuel Use in Developing Countries: Review of Theory and Evidence (2018, result): “Arthur et al. (2010), Lay et al. (2013) and Baiyegunhi and Hassan (2014) find that house owners are more likely to shift towards cleaner fuels as compared to tenants, which is contrary to the results reported by Ouedraogo (2006) and Pundo and Fraser (2006).”