The use of environmental DNA of fishes as an efficient method of determining habitat connectivity

By H. Yamanaka, Toshifumi Minamoto. 2016

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/75c464d5c7826b6ab52bd7538233320b28cc8e0e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. M. Miya
2. T. Sado
3. H. Yamanaka
4. Toshifumi Minamoto
5. Satoshi Yamamoto

In Molecular Biology

1. M. Miya
2. T. Sado
3. H. Yamanaka
4. Toshifumi Minamoto
5. Satoshi Yamamoto
6. Miki Baba
7. Yukuto Sato

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. T. Sado
2. M. Miya

Citations in the corpus

• A simple method for preserving environmental DNA in water samples at ambient temperature by addition of cationic surfactant (2017, background): “…shed by a target species into surrounding water is commonly applied to reveal the macroorganism distribution (Goldberg et al. 2011; Keskin 2014; Yamanaka and Minamoto 2016) and in some cases to estimate the biomass or abundance (Takahara et al. 2012; Klymus et al. 2015; Lacoursière-Roussel et…”
• Comparing local‐ and regional‐scale estimations of the diversity of stream fish using eDNA metabarcoding and conventional observation methods (2018, background): “…cells has been 53 detected in various aquatic environments (Kelly et al., 2014a), including ponds (Takahara et 54 al., 2012, 2013; Sigsgaard et al., 2015), rivers (Jerde et al., 2013; Mahon et al., 2013; Wilcox 55 et al., 2013; Yamanaka & Minamoto, 2016), and marine waters (Yamamoto et al., 2016).”