Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics.

By Thomas J. Webster, C. Ergun, R. Doremus, R. W. Siegel, R. Bizios. Biomaterials, 2000

1,289 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Oral Surgery, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/75bc546bdb8a3f49d5ee54c411f487125b8115ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Noam Eliaz
2. N. Metoki
3. Sumit Arora
4. E. Fortunati
5. Thomas J. Webster
6. R. Prasad

In Surgery

1. N. Metoki
2. Noam Eliaz

Citations in the corpus

• Biodegradable polymer matrix nanocomposites for tissue engineering: A review (2010, background): “Thus, there is a growing recognition that a nanosized inorganic component is likely to be more bioactive than a micro-sized one [68].”
• Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. (2004, background): “For the first time, this manuscript represents an attempt to advance design criteria utilized for improving osteoblast function on ceramics [7,11,14], polymers [9,10], and composites [9,10] to metals.”
• Calcium Phosphate Bioceramics: A Review of Their History, Structure, Properties, Coating Technologies and Biomedical Applications (2017, background): “It has been shown that nano-HAp promotes enhanced osteoblast adhesion, differentiation and proliferation, osteointegration, and deposition of Ca-containing minerals on its surface, compared to conventional micro-HAp, which leads to enhanced formation of new bone tissue within a short period [413].”
• The interaction of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the nanometre scale. (2010, background): “These results were related to an increased number of grain boundaries at the surface of nanophase structures compared with conventional materials and, consequently, to a change in surface energetics that influences protein interactions that mediate cell adhesion [130].”
• The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation (2011, background): “Relatively few studies have examined the effects of nanostructured surfaces on osteoblast differentiation [12,36,37,42,43].”
• Nanotoxicology and in vitro studies: the need of the hour. (2012, background): “…in the identification of many unique properties of nanomaterials such as enhanced magnetic, catalytic, optical, electrical, and mechanical properties when compared to conventional formulations of the same material (Ferrari, 2005; Qin et al., 1999; Vasir et al., 2005; Webster et al., 1999, 2000).”