Substorm energy budget during low and high solar activity: 1997 and 1999 compared

By E. Tanskanen, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, H. Koskinen, J. Slavin. 2002

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/75970128a86e5a4a8b767e81d7f094562678abd2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. V. Angelopoulos
2. S. Mende
3. H. Frey
4. E. Tanskanen
5. A. Runov
6. Wen Li
7. Xuzhi Zhou
8. R. Thorne

In Geophysics

1. E. Tanskanen
2. V. Angelopoulos
3. H. Frey
4. S. Mende
5. H. Liu

In Molecular Biology

1. V. Angelopoulos
2. E. Tanskanen
3. S. Mende

Citations in the corpus

• Substorm onset observations by IMAGE-FUV (2004, background): “The development of large systems of groundbased magnetometers or riometers, like MIRACLE or CANOPUS [Amm et al., 2001; Tanskanen et al., 2002; Samson et al., 1992; Voronkov et al., 1999; Syrjäsuo, 1998], allowed for more systematic studies of the magnetic pulsations and absorption features that…”
• A comprehensive high‐throughput analysis of substorms observed by IMAGE magnetometer network: Years 1993–2003 examined (2009, methodology): “[30] As a check of the algorithmical search concept, the substorms found using the method described in chapter 2.2 were compared to substorms obtained for years 1997 and 1999 using the same IL index [Tanskanen et al., 2002].”