NOMENCLATURE OF AMPHIBOLES: ADDITIONS AND REVISIONS TO THE INTERNATIONAL MINERALOGICAL ASSOCIATION’S 1997 RECOMMENDATIONS

By B. Leake, A. Woolley, W. Birch, E. Burke, G. Ferraris, J. Grice, F. Hawthorne, H. J. Kisch, V. Krivovichev, J. Schumacher and 2 more. 2003

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Inorganic Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/758c1793a2bd2e6da90cfcd9d0a629d974fe8287

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

1. Andrew J. Locock

In Inorganic Chemistry

1. Andrew J. Locock

Citations in the corpus

• An Excel spreadsheet to classify chemical analyses of amphiboles following the IMA 2012 recommendations (2014, background): “The compositional complexity of amphiboles has driven several previous attempts by the International Mineralogical Association to organize their nomenclature (Leake, 1978; Leake et al., 1997, 2003; Burke and Leake, 2004).”
• An experimental study of amphibole stability in low-pressure granitic magmas and a revised Al-in-hornblende geobarometer (2016, background): “All of the experimental amphiboles classify as calcic (>1.5 Ca apfu) and lie within the compositional range defined by hornblende (Leake et al. 2003).”