Technical guidelines for the management of field and in vitro germplasm collections.

By B. Reed, F. Engelmann, M. E. Dulloo, J. Engels. 2004

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ex Situ and In Situ Conservation of Agricultural Biodiversity: Major Advances and Research Needs (2010, background): “seeds that are desiccation and/or cold sensitive) or are clonally propagated are traditionally conserved as live plants in field genebanks (Reed et al., 2004; Dulloo 2001).”
Cryopreserved storage of clonal germplasm in the USDA National Plant Germplasm System (2017, methodology): “Developing duplicates or backup collections for this germplasm creates an additional challenge (Reed et al. 2004a).”
Cryopreservation of Phytodiversity: A Critical Appraisal of Theory & Practice (2008, background): “$1 per annum per accession for LN supply ( Reed et al , 2004a ).”
Challenges and Prospects for the Conservation of Crop Genetic Resources in Field Genebanks, in In Vitro Collections and/or in Liquid Nitrogen (2020, methodology): “In 2000, the maintenance costs for one cassava accession at CIAT, Colombia, was estimated to be USD 7, USD 25, and USD 43 in the field, in vitro and in cryo conditions, respectively [14].”