Heterogeneity in Perceptions of National Economic Conditions

By R. Duch, H. Palmer, C. Anderson. 2000

419 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Mecro-Economic Voting: Local Information and Micro-Perceptions of the Macro-Economy (2014, neutral): “(1997); Anderson et al. (2000); Palmer and Duch (2001); Duch and Palmer (2002); Anderson et al.”
Macroeconomic performance, political trust and the Great Recession: A multilevel analysis of the effects of within‐country fluctuations in macroeconomic performance on political trust in 15 EU countries, 1999–2011 (2016, background): “Some level of education is necessary to acquire and process information and to judge political institutions on objective criteria (Delli Carpini & Keeter 1996; Duch et al. 2000; Hakhverdian & Mayne 2012; Van der Meer 2010).”
Economics and Elections Revisited (2013, background): “Duch and Stevenson (2008) take on this argument, comparing a “sparse” specification with a “rich” specification.”
Voting in Open Economies (2007, background): “into question the usefulness of using survey responses as an unbiased measure of democratic accountability ( Duch, Palmer, & Anderson, 2000 ).”
Ecologies of Unease: Geographic Context and National Economic Evaluations (2011, background): “and abroad that economic evaluations are the product of an individual’s political conditioning, as expressed by their party identification, particularly in an election year (Conover et al. 1986, 1987; Duch et al. 2000; Evans and Andersen 2006; Gerber and Huber 2009, 2010).”