Structural investigations of microbial cellulose produced in stationary and agitated culture

By Wojciech K Czaja, D. Romanovicz, R. Brown. 2004

496 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review (2010, background): “These microfibril bundles have excellent intrinsic properties due to their high crystallinity (up to 84–89%; Czaja et al. 2004), including a reported elastic modulus of 78 GPa (Guhados et al.”
Biotechnological Applications of Acetic Acid Bacteria (2008, background): “D structure consisting of an ultrafine network of cellulose nanofibers (3–8 nm), which are highly uniaxially oriented (Czaja, Romanovicz, and Brown, 2004).”
Effect of different additives on bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum and analysis of material property (2009, unknown): “X-ray diffraction patterns obtained from our BC samples demonstrated three main characteristic peaks standing for crystal plane \-110[, \110[, and \200[, which showed that both CMC-free and CMC-altered cellulose was mainly in cellulose I-b form after compared the database of MDI Jade 8 software, whi”
Recent advances in bacterial cellulose (2014, background): “(Czaja et al. 2004), while the data varies from 40 to 60 % for plant cellulose (Jonas and Farah 1998).”