Prices and poverty in India

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Rural Non-Farm Employment in India (2016, methodology): “2 To render the income data spatially comparable incomes have been deflated by the state-level Tornqvist price indices for rural areas recently produced by Deaton and Tarozzi (2000).”
Price, unit value, and quality demanded (2011, background): “…is that one can look at differences in the prices paid by subgroup, allowing one to see how prices have changed for the quality of goods actually consumed by the group.2 These advantages have been pointed out and exploited by several recent papers (Deaton and Tarozzi, 2000; Deaton et al., 2004).”
Retail Globalization and Household Welfare: Evidence from Mexico (2015, methodology): “45Dube et al. (2007) find county wage bills fall 1.”
Calculating Comparable Statistics From Incomparable Surveys, With an Application to Poverty in India (2004, background): “…Labourers (CPIAL) for rural areas and the Consumer Price Index for Industrial Workers (CPIIW) for the urban sector (for a more thorough discussion on the Indian poverty lines, see Government of India 1993 or Deaton and Tarozzi 2005 who also proposed alternative price indexes to measure inflation).”