A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials

By Julian P. T. Higgins, J. Sterne, J. Savović, Matthew J. Page, A. Hrõbjartsson, I. Boutron, B. Reeves, S. Eldridge. 2016

1,588 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7562547421fd3ca23bfff18b0dbfcdc230fffc8a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. PhD Elizabeth C Adkins
2. Nathan Winquist
3. C. Stiles-Shields
4. PhD Q Eileen Wafford
5. M. A. K. G. Mst
6. E. Lattie

Citations in the corpus

• Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2018, methodology): “risk of bias in randomized trials [36] and the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk in nonrandomized studies of interventions [37].”
• PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2019, unknown): “A domain-based structure was adopted similar to that used in other risk of bias tools such as the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool,(29) QUADAS-2,(36) ROBINSI(30) and ROBIS.”