Heart of darkness: modeling public-private funding interactions inside the R&D black box

By Paul A. David, Bronwyn H Hall. 2000

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/755b599ccdd5989438384241bdebe0ad543392d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

R&D subsidies and private R&D expenditures: evidence from Italian manufacturing data (2011, background): “Despite the quantity of literature on evaluation of public R&D policies, there is no consensus and the results are rather controversial (David and Hall 2000; David, Hall, and Toole 2000; Klette, Møen, and Griliches 2000; Hall 2005).”
Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D (2003, background): “371 ß Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 2002. crowd out privately ¢nanced R&D is through their e¡ect on the price of inelastically supplied R&D inputs (David and Hall, 2000).”
Systems of Innovation (2009, background): “In the systems approach, subsidies serve a more general purpose that includes influencing the nature of the knowledge base in firms, and to increase absorption capacity (e.g., Bach and Matt, 2005 and David and Hall, 2000).”
Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level? (2009, background): “The “effect” policymakers and academics have been interested in, is whether government R&D expenditures and company financed R&D behave like substitutes or complements (David & Hall, 2000; Georghiou & Roessner, 2000).”
The "Matthew Effect" in R&D Public Subsidies: the Italian Evidence (2013, unknown): “However, the actual impact of R&D subsidies on firm’s innovative activities is not obvious and it is possible that public subsidies crowd-out private investment (David and Hall, 2000; David et al., 2000; Hall and van Reenen, 2000; Bloom et al., 2002).”
Measuring the Returns to R&D (2010, background): “Third, public R&D can encourage private R&D and hence have an indirect rate of return (see David and Hall 2000 for a review of this evidence, which is mixed).”
Absorptive capacity, R&D spillovers, and public policy (2007, unknown): “Our model simplifies by assuming that R&D spending is homogeneous, whereas many applications of the absorptive 19 For a discussion of the issues surrounding publicly-funded R&D, as well as a review of the econometric evidence for its effects on private R&D, see David and Hall (2000).”
Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit?* (2016, unknown): “…we aim at contributing to an on-going debate about the returns of public R&D funding (Jones & Williams, 1998; Salter & Martin, 2001), and in particular about whether public money is used in the most effective way (David & Hall, 2000; David, Hall, & Toole, 2000; Klette, Møen, & Griliches, 2000).”
The effectiveness of subsidies revisited: Accounting for wage and employment effects in business R&D (2008, background): “David and Hall (2000) have argued that structural modelling of the “R&D black box” is necessary to better interpret the empirical estimates of subsidy effectiveness.”
Does government funding complement or substitute private research funding to universities (2013, unknown): “…such as research contracts and consultancies in their various mostly focuses, recalling the theoretical basis provided by Arrow (1962), on the impact of public R&D contracts and grants upon private R&D investment by manufacturing ﬁrms and industries (David and Hall, 2000; David et al., 2000).”