Scale-dependent droplet clustering in turbulent clouds

By A. Kostinski, Raymond A. Shaw. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2001

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Numerical simulation of turbulent sediment transport, from bed load to saltation (2011, background): “[8] A.”
Droplet growth in warm turbulent clouds (2012, methodology): “…including the Fishing test (Baker, 1992), clustering index (Chaumat and Brenguier, 2001), pair-correlation function and its volume average (Kostinski and Shaw, 2001; Shaw et al., 2002; Lehmann et al., 2007), analysis of power spectra (Pinsky and Khain, 2001, 2003) and analysis of…”
PARTICLE-TURBULENCE INTERACTIONS IN ATMOSPHERIC CLOUDS (2003, methodology): “In a study using a single traverse during SCMS, Kostinski & Shaw (2001) searched for scale-dependent clustering of droplets in a core region of the cloud where mixing was expected to be negligible.”
Turbulent clustering of stagnation points and inertial particles (2006, unknown): “This mechanism is reminiscent of the one proposed by Maxey & Corrsin (1986) and Maxey (1987) to explain the effects that turbulence can have on particle settling velocities.”
Sling Effect in Collisions of Water Droplets in Turbulent Clouds (2006, background): “First, inertial particles cluster in random flows, which increases P. This effect of preferential concentration has been identified long ago and is still the subject of intensive study (see Maxey 1987; Squires and Eaton 1991; Wang and Maxey 1993; Sundaram and Collins 1997; Reade and Collins 2000; K”