Intangible assets as drivers of innovation: Empirical evidence on multinational enterprises in German and UK regional systems of innovation

By Jan-Philipp Kramer, E. Marinelli, S. Iammarino, J. R. Diez. 2011

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/75322937724c2e52e22d6a784d11343234d00d9b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Piers Thompson
2. Robert Huggins
3. Jie Wu
4. Andrew Johnston

In Strategy and Management

1. Piers Thompson
2. Robert Huggins
3. Shuaihe Zhuo
4. Zefu Wu
5. Jie Wu
6. Patroklos Georgiadis
7. E. Malecki
8. Michael Dowling

Citations in the corpus

• The impact of innovation policies on the performance of national innovation systems: A system dynamics analysis (2012, background): “Innovative performance, however, relies more frequently on intangible assets as the economy moves to specialised non-repetitious activities (Kramer et al., 2011).”
• Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: a network theory (2015, background): “…returns is itself a form of capital, which can be termed network capital (Huggins 2010; Huggins and Johnston 2010; Kramera and Revilla Diez 2012; Kramera et al. 2011; Lawton Smith et al. 2012; Huggins et al. 2012; Huggins and Thompson 2014; Fitjar and Huber 2014; Sleuwaegen and Boiardi 2014).”
• National innovation system, social entrepreneurship, and rural economic growth in China (2017, background): “…concepts such as national innovation system(NIS) and regional innovation systems (RIS) (Braczyk et al., 1998; Cantner et al., 2010; Chung, 2002; Kramer et al., 2011), sectoral innovation systems (Dolfsma and Seo, 2013; Kirchhoff, 1989; Malerba, 2002), technological road mapping (Carvalho et…”