Stochastic gradient estimate variance in contrastive divergence and persistent contrastive divergence
By Mathias Berglund, Tapani Raiko. 2013
Contrastive Divergence (CD) and Persistent Contrastive Divergence (PCD) are popular methods for training the weights of Restricted Boltzmann Machines. However, both methods use an approximate method for sampling from the model distribution. As a side effect, these approximations yield significantly different biases and variances for stochastic gradient estimates of individual data points. It is well known that CD yields a biased gradient estimate. In this paper we however show empirically that CD has a lower stochastic gradient estimate variance than exact sampling, while the mean of subsequent PCD estimates has a higher variance than exact sampling. The results give one explanation to the finding that CD can be used with smaller minibatches or higher learning rates than PCD.
Subfields: Optimization & Training
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Optimization & Training
- Jascha Narain Sohl-Dickstein
- Samy Bengio
- Laurent Dinh
- Greg Yang
- Yoshua Bengio
- Sam Schoenholz
- Jakub Konecný
- Surya Ganguli
Citations in the corpus
- Density estimation using Real NVP (2016, background): “In particular, the variational autoencoder algorithm [35, 49] simultaneously learns a generative network, that maps gaussian latent variables z to samples x, and a matched approximate inference network that maps samples x to a semantically meaningful latent representation z, by exploiting the…”