Prediction models of landscape preferences at the forest stand level

By Harri Silvennoinen, J. Alho, O. Kolehmainen, T. Pukkala. 2001

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The impact of agroforestry networks on scenic beauty estimation: The role of a landscape ecological network on a socio-cultural process (2003, background): “…influencing it (mostlyAppleton, 1975; Bell, 1995, 1999; Bourassa, 1991; Lamb and Purcell, 1990; Kaplan and Kaplan, 1982; Kellomaki and Savolainen, 1984; Lamb, 1990; Schroeder, 1986; Silvennoinen et al., 2001), and from a literature review of similar empirical models (e.g. Scrinzi et al., 1996).”
Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda (2012, background): “However, perceptual assessments of predominantly natural landscapes have consistently shown consensus to be far greater than disagreement (30), and quantitative models based on biophysical landscape characteristics typically account for the largest share of variance in measures of perceived aestheti”