Interoception in anxiety and depression

By Martin P. Paulus, Murray B. Stein. Brain Structure and Function, 2010

878 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We review the literature on interoception as it relates to depression and anxiety, with a focus on belief, and alliesthesia. The connection between increased but noisy afferent interoceptive input, self-referential and belief-based states, and top-down modulation of poorly predictive signals is integrated into a neuroanatomical and processing model for depression and anxiety. The advantage of this conceptualization is the ability to specifically examine the interface between basic interoception, self-referential belief-based states, and enhanced top-down modulation to attenuate poor predictability. We conclude that depression and anxiety are not simply interoceptive disorders but are altered interoceptive states as a consequence of noisily amplified self-referential interoceptive predictive belief states.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/75187f133e0ea5f2e76854f040afd7fc201dc764

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Anil K. Seth
  2. Sarah N. Garfinkel
  3. Keisuke Suzuki
  4. Hugo D. Critchley
  5. Adam B. Barrett
  6. A. Stewart
  7. Cynthia Price
  8. W. Mehling

In Psychiatry and Mental health

  1. Sarah N. Garfinkel
  2. Hugo D. Critchley
  3. Anil K. Seth
  4. Keisuke Suzuki
  5. Adam B. Barrett
  6. Lisa Feldman Barrett
  7. Andy Clark
  8. Karl J. Friston

In Philosophy

  1. Sarah N. Garfinkel
  2. Hugo D. Critchley
  3. Anil K. Seth
  4. Keisuke Suzuki
  5. Lisa Feldman Barrett

Citations in the corpus