The effects of forest fragmentation on bee communities in tropical countryside

By Berry J. Brosi, Gretchen Daily, T. Shih, Federico Oviedo, Guillermo Durán. 2007

277 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7502c3cfa5e64beb34dec33476a3a46173d41e7d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Nearby rainforest promotes coffee pollination by increasing spatio-temporal stability in bee species richness (2009, background): “Most susceptible are small, stingless eusocial bee species such as members of the family Meliponinae that often nest in high trees (Roubik, 1988; Heard, 1999; Brown and Albrecht, 2001; Slaa et al., 2006; Brosi et al., 2008).”
What do we know about the effects of landscape changes on plant–pollinator interaction networks? (2013, unknown): “…complexity usually lead to the reduction of ﬂoral resources and nesting areas in the remaining available habitat patches, impairing population survival and reducing their overall diversity (Potts et al., 2003; Klein et al., 2004; Brosi et al., 2008; Jha and Vandermeer, 2009; Goulson et al., 2010).”
How well do we understand landscape effects on pollinators and pollination services (2012, background): “Local extinctions could lead to the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions with unpredictable consequences for the maintenance of biodiversity and environmental services (e.g., SteffanDewenter & Tscharntke 1999; Girão et al. 2007; Brosi et al. 2008; Lopes et al. 2009; Tabarelli et al. 2010).”
Impacts of coffee agroforestry management on tropical bee communities. (2010, background): “While a handful of studies have similarly found that bee richness does not increase with increasing semi-natural habitat size or availability (Donaldson et al., 2002; Cane et al., 2006; Brosi et al., 2008), the majority”
Pollination services from field-scale agricultural diversification may be context-dependent (2015, background): “As a result, re-diversification of agricultural areas has been proposed as a means of bolstering pollination services from these alternate pollinators (Steffan-Dewenter and Leschke, 2003; Kremen et al., 2007; Tscharntke et al., 2005; Brosi et al., 2008; Holzschuh et al., 2008; Winfree, 2010; Garibal”
Home site advantage in two long‐lived arctic plant species: results from two 30‐year reciprocal transplant studies (2012, background): “Despite this, moderate and non-extreme landscape alteration might prevent species from totally disappearing, which may be the reason why we did not find a negative effect for richness; although changes in community composition might occur (Brosi et al. 2008).”
Factors affecting bee communities in forest openings and adjacent mature forest (2017, background): “We chose to examine area because there is a lack of consensus regarding the influence of patch size on bees (e.g., Bommarco et al., 2010 and Brosi et al., 2008).”
Impact of landscape alteration and invasions on pollinators: a meta‐analysis (2012, background): “Despite the scarcity of studies, there is direct (see Bartomeus, Vilà & Steffan-Dewenter 2010) and indirect (e.g. Aizen & Feinsinger 1994; Brosi et al. 2008) evidence for interactions between landscape alteration and invasions.”