ADVANCED TECHNIQUES FOR MODELING AVIAN NEST SURVIVAL

By S. Dinsmore, G. White, F. Knopf. 2002

937 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74f4e5000724f4aae3b938770bcc8517502d1673

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Parasitology

Citations in the corpus

Nest Predation of Greater Sage-Grouse in Relation to Microhabitat Factors and Predators (2010, methodology): “The nest survival model in Program MARK is robust for evaluating time-dependent covariates (Dinsmore et al. 2002).”
NEST SITE SELECTION AND NESTING SUCCESS IN SALTMARSH BREEDING SPARROWS: THE IMPORTANCE OF NEST HABITAT, TIMING, AND STUDY SITE DIFFERENCES (2005, methodology): “We used program MARK (White and Burnham 1999) to model daily nest survival, and calculated overall nest success as the product of daily survival rates across the 26-day nesting period (Dinsmore et al. 2002, Traylor et al. 2004).”
Living on the Edge: Viability of Moose in Northeastern Minnesota (2010, background): “Eberhardt (1977, 2002) proposed that when confronted by reduced resources, vital rates would change in a specific order.”
Modeling avian nest survival in program mark (2007, methodology): “Daily survival is illustrated for three scenarios of nest height: below average (0.5 SD below the mean), average (at the mean), and above average (1 SD above the mean). found in Dinsmore et al. (2002).”
Grizzly Bear Population Vital Rates and Trend in the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem, Montana (2012, methodology): “We followed Schwartz et al. (2006b) to estimate COY and yearling survival using the nest success procedure of Dinsmore et al. (2002) in Program MARK (White and Burnham 1999).”
Climatic effects on the breeding phenology and reproductive success of an arctic‐nesting goose species (2008, methodology): “Nesting success data were analysed using the procedure of Dinsmore et al. (2002).”
Exotic shrubs as ephemeral ecological traps for nesting birds (2009, result): “Our findings of temporally variable predation risk are consistent with past studies that show greater predation risk occurs early in the nesting season (Filliater et al. 1994; Dinsmore et al. 2002; Mahony et al. 2006).”
Vulnerability of ground-nesting waterbirds to predation by invasive American mink in the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, Chile. (2009, methodology): “We use the term nest survival to refer to the probability that a nest will hatch at least one young over the entire nesting period (Dinsmore et al., 2002; Jehle et al., 2004).”
Ecological traps in isodars: effects of tallgrass prairie management on bird nest success (2005, background): “Recently there have been several important advances in the statistical analysis of avian nest survival (Dinsmore et al. 2002, Nur et al. 2004, Shaffer 2004).”
AGE-RELATED SURVIVAL AND BEHAVIOR OF SNOWY PLOVER CHICKS (2007, methodology): “We modelled chick survival using the nest survival model (Dinsmore et al. 2002) in Program MARK (White and Burnham 1999).”
ASSESSING THE DEVELOPMENT OF SHOREBIRD EGGS USING THE FLOTATION METHOD: SPECIES-SPECIFIC AND GENERALIZED REGRESSION MODELS (2007, background): “The availability of these equations is timely since the need to determine the incubation age of embryos will likely increase as researchers begin including embryo age (or ‘‘nest age’’) as a covariate in nest survivorship models (Dinsmore et al. 2002, Jehle et al. 2004, Nur et al. 2004).”
A multi-scaled analysis of avian response to habitat amount and fragmentation in the Canadian dry mixed-grass prairie (2006, methodology): “We used a modified logistic regression approach to compare effects of these habitat variables on songbird and duck nest success ( Dinsmore et al. 2002 ) using PROC NLMIXED within SAS 8.0.2 (SAS Institute Inc.”