"Speaking as a Heterosexual": (How) Does Sexuality Matter for Talk-in-Interaction?

By Celia Kitzinger. 2005

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74f40c43b691111c5248d70b6b31c3517a9f2c8b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Victoria Land
2. Gene H. Lerner

In Language and Linguistics

1. Celia Kitzinger
2. Victoria Land
3. Gene H. Lerner
4. Galina B. Bolden
5. Lorenza Mondada
6. Geoffrey Raymond
7. Kobin H. Kendrick
8. Tanya Stivers

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Celia Kitzinger
2. Victoria Land
3. Gene H. Lerner
4. Lorenza Mondada
5. Tanya Stivers
6. E. Schegloff
7. Kobin H. Kendrick
8. Jeffrey D. Robinson

Citations in the corpus

• Speaking as a Lesbian: Correcting the Heterosexist Presumption (2005, methodology): “[Oh- ] 07 Che: [Rach]el 08 and Melinda fr[om Women Only (Walk)] Finally (and just like heterosexuals; Kitzinger, 2005c), lesbians can invoke their partners with a locally subsequent reference form (such as we) in locally initial position.”
• Extraction and aggregation in the repair of individual and collective self-reference (2007, background): “Participants in conversation with others have been found to orient to their own entitlements to knowledge and experience and to the entitlements of their coparticipants (see Drew, 1991; Goffman, 1974; Goodwin, 1981; Heritage and Raymond, 2005; Kamio, 1997; Kitzinger, 2005a, 2005b; Labov, 1972; Lab”