Assessment of ecological effects due to forest harvesting: approaches and statistical issues

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Impacts of restoration treatments on alien plant invasion in Pinus ponderosa forests, Montana, USA (2006, methodology): “The operational scale at which we implemented treatments, coupled with a replicated and randomized experimental design, which is rare in studies of forest stand manipulations (Bennett & Adams 2004), instil confidence in the differential responses of alien and transformer species in our study.”
Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals (2009, result): “The problems with experimental design and reporting that we have identified are also in line with similar reviews of the literature in various other scientific and clinical research areas [18–25].”
Assessment of land use impact on biodiversity: Proposal of a new methodology exemplified with forestry operations in Norway (2008, background): “Bennett and Adams 2004 ), but expert judgements are often seen as a good approximation (Seppala et al. 1998, Scholes and Biggs 2005).”
Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research (2010, unknown): “[22] It is unlikely that this issue is confined to clinical research.[2-14,16-20]”