Systemic problems affecting co-innovation in the New Zealand Agricultural Innovation System: Identification of blocking mechanisms and underlying institutional logics

By J. Turner, L. Klerkx, K. Rijswijk, T. Williams, Tim Barnard. 2016

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instruments – Assessing their contribution to innovation system function dynamics (2019, background): “…Hartwich et al. (2005); Spielman and Von Grebmer (2006). sector level within a country [see: Hermans et al., 2015; Lamprinopoulou et al., 2014; Turner et al., 2016 for examples], but they can also be considered as a kind of Technological Innovation System (TIS) by focussing on a particular…”
Systemic perspectives on scaling agricultural innovations. A review (2016, background): “2013; Wittmayer and Schäpke 2014), and this will also require that an enabling environment is created as existing procedures, incentive systems and funding mechanisms may work against such new roles (Roux et al. 2010; Turner et al. 2016).”