Testing for Necessary and/or Sufficient Causation: Which Cases Are Relevant?

By Jason Seawright. Political Analysis, 2002

58 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74ba8b0a165671db122acc4ca68497fcc7d90d94

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. I. Rohlfing
2. Carsten Q. Schneider
3. Martino Maggetti
4. Eva Thomann

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Martino Maggetti
2. Eva Thomann
3. I. Rohlfing
4. Carsten Q. Schneider
5. Michael Baumgartner
6. Adrian Dusa
7. Jasper J. Hotho

In Statistics and Probability

1. I. Rohlfing
2. Carsten Q. Schneider
3. Martino Maggetti
4. Eva Thomann

Citations in the corpus

• Combining QCA and Process Tracing in Set-Theoretic Multi-Method Research (2013, background): “See the debate between Seawright (2002a; 2002b), Braumoeller and Goertz (2002), and Clarke (2002) on which cases are relevant for evaluating set relations.”
• Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools (2020, background): “Yet, if such samples are representative, then the QCA tool kit does offer statistical measures of uncertainty for necessity and sufficiency claims (Braumoeller and Goertz 2000; Eliason and Stryker 2009; Goertz, Hak, and Dul 2013; Longest and Vaisey 2008; Ragin 2000; Seawright 2002).”