Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis.
By F. Locatelli. New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
914 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74b431dbed687d3e6cc01e6e7bff5d2c8d932de6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- P. Stenvinkel
- K. Abbott
- J. Carrero
- A. Salahudeen
- R. Kilpatrick
- J. Axelsson
- B. Lindholm
- O. Heimbürger
Citations in the corpus
- Survival advantages of obesity in dialysis patients. (2005, background): “ing the HEMO (3) and ADAMEX (4) studies, failed to show any”
- Effect of frequent nocturnal hemodialysis vs conventional hemodialysis on left ventricular mass and quality of life: a randomized controlled trial. (2007, unknown): “Median (interquartile range), y 3 (1-9) 4 (2-6)”
- KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Hemodialysis Adequacy: 2015 update. (2015, methodology): “(B) When normalized to BSA, women randomized in men.(129) Reproduced with permission of the American Society”
- Emerging biomarkers for evaluating cardiovascular risk in the chronic kidney disease patient: how do new pieces fit into the uremic puzzle? (2008, background): “trolled trials have consistently shown no survival benefit from multiple new treatment strategies, such as increased dialysis dose (2,3), intensified nutrition (4), homocysteine-lowering therapy (5), normalization of hemoglobin with erythropoietin (6,7), lipid lowering with statins (8), and treatmen”